<aside> 🪧 This rubric shows publicly how all applications received from the RWAIG form are evaluated. The RWAIG team will use these criteria to provide a score to each application received or, in the event, discard it immediately if it violates one or more of the conditions mentioned.
</aside>
Note: This rubric is to be used in addition to the Initial Gitcoin Screening Application review rubric.
| Rate | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expected level of awareness initiative in quality and reach | Quality and reach at question | Low-quality / low-reach | Medium-quality / medium-reach | High-quality / high-reach |
| Probability of success supported by proof points | Minimal | Low | Medium | High |
| GTM Plan | None provided | Low clarity & high-level | Quite clear & comprehensive | Perfectly clear & comprehensive |
| KPIs Outlined | No tracking available | Fairly trackable | Trackable | Easy and |
| updated tracking |